If USA Invade Greenland?

 BREAKING!

France just has seized a Russian oil tanker from 

the Mediterranean sea. France Navy, with the 

help of UK intelligence services, captured the 

alleged "shadow fleet" which was transporting 

Russia oil, the French soldiers successfully were 

on board the oil tanker. According to global 

news outlets, the tanker hailed from Murmansk 

and planted a false flag to evade western 

sanctions on Russian oil tankers.

President Emmanuel Macron said the action was 

legal under United Nations Convention on the 

Law of Seas. He also praised brave French 

soldiers for successfully carrying out this 

operation.

Now what we think is, this a serious escalation 

with Russians Macron is seeking! Perhaps, he is 

trying to please Daddy Trump as well, cuz 

recently some of his statements displeased 

Trump. Trump even said no body cared about 

Emmanuel as he would be leaving the office 

soon!

What do ya all think about this?

News Source: Reuters

Kuddos to this kid for taking and seeing this 

innocent furbaby injured and doing what he 

could to care for this furbaby…

Whenever she asked why, the boy would give 

the same innocent reply: "I just stopped to 

say hello to the husky." Since their neighbors 

did indeed own a husky, the mother didn’t 

think much of it.

But when she mentioned it to the neighbors, 

they told her that their husky had been away 

the entire week. Hearing this, the mother’s 

heart sank.

Feeling both curious and concerned, she 

quietly followed her son the next day. Walking 

through a quiet alley, she saw her son kneeling 

beside a severely injured wolf, gently sharing 

his snacks with it. The wolf had a broken leg 

and could barely move—it was the boy’s 

kindness that had kept it alive until then.

The mother immediately contacted the 

relevant authorities, and the wolf was rescued 

and received medical treatment. Later, 

surveillance footage confirmed that the boy 

had been feeding the wolf every day after 

school. The story soon spread online, with 

thousands of netizens commenting: "Children 

see the world differently than we do. They 

don’t label things as 'dangerous'—they simply 

see a life in need of love."

l

In America, a 15-year-old boy was arrested for 

stealing bread and cheese.

When he was presented in court, the judge 

asked him why he stole.

Tears filled the boy’s eyes, and he said that his 

mother was seriously ill,

he himself was hungry, and he didn’t even have 

enough money to buy food.

Hearing this, the judge became emotional. 

Instead of punishing the boy, he turned to 

everyone present in the courtroom and said:

“If a child in our society is forced to steal food 

just to survive, then the criminal is not him — 

it is all of us.”

The judge fined every person present in the court

-room 50 dollars for allowing such a situation to 

arise.
He also fined the shopkeeper 500 dollars for not 

helping a hungry child.

All the collected money was given to the boy, 

and he was allowed to leave without any 

punishment.

In our country, laws seem to apply only to the 

poor, while powerful people roam freely.

Here, even judges who take crores in bribes still 

sit in court delivering justice.

How can we expect them to do justice correctly?

But this judge gave a remarkable judgment.
It is true — if there is a king, and someone in his 

kingdom sleeps hungry, the one truly guilty is 

the king.

The photo which I never forget:

This photo remains the most difficult for me to 

look at, of the tens of thousands of war photos 

I have seen of any war. The worst and the best 

of human nature in a single photograph.

Ukraine vs. 1942.

Australian commando Leonard Sifleet (1916-1943) about to be executed by Japanese officer Yasuno Chikao. Aitape, Papua, New Guinea, circa 1943. Sifleet, an Australian commando (Special Unit M) was captured on Aitape, an island off the coast of Papua New Guinea, after his team was ambushed by indigenous Papuans loyal to the Japanese.

Might be handy in. Chicago.

In the forests of Sweden, there are cages similar 

to this cage with pictures that are closed from 

the inside only, and they are always open and 

have ground communication devices to ask for 

help.

The function of these cages is to protect you 

from bears and other animals when you wander 

in the Swedish forests because Sweden's forests 

are vast and have brown bears scattered in 

northern and central Sweden, perhaps around 

cities, but they are located in the depths of the 

forests.

So you will see these cages when you head to 

the north and middle areas and sometimes 

you see them in specific places in southern 

Sweden.

The state is very keen on the safety of its 

homelands, so there are such cages.

This Judge is one in a million. Must be an angel 

on earth. Bless you Judge

His eyes kept drifting to the gallery, searching 

for the one person who mattered most.

His mother had worked back-to-back shifts 

at two hospitals for months to afford his 

defense, skipping her own doctor 

appointments despite chest pains. She'd 

texted him that morning: "I'll be there, baby. 

Always." 

Her seat stayed empty. 

An hour after sentencing, while Tyrell sat 

shackled in the concrete holding cell, his 

lawyer delivered news that shattered him 

completely. His mother's heart had given 

out that morning while getting dressed 

for court. The stress, the sleepless nights, 

the worry—it had been too much.

"I killed her," Tyrell whispered, collapsing. 

"This is on me." 

The bailiff, a 20-year veteran who'd seen every 

-thing, knocked on Judge Vance's door. "Your 

Honor, that kid down there isn't just crying. 

He's destroying himself." 

Judge Vance—known for his no-nonsense 

approach but also his fairness — faced a 

choice. He could let the system handle it: 

send the chaplain, file the paperwork, 

move on to the next case. 

Instead, he did something extraordinary.

Still wearing his black robes, the judge walked 

down to the cell block—a place judges simply 

don't go. He sat on the metal cot next to Tyrell 

and gently took the teenager's cuffed hands.

"Look at me, son," Judge Vance said softly. 

"Your mother didn't raise you for this moment 

to define you. She raised you for what comes 

next."

Through his tears, Tyrell choked out, "She's 

gone because of what I did."

"You made mistakes," the judge replied. "But 

you're 19 years old. Your story isn't over— it's 

just beginning. And I'm going to help you 

write the next chapter."

Judge Vance personally arranged Tyrell's 

temporary release for the funeral. But he 

didn't stop there. He promised to visit Tyrell 

in prison monthly and personally review his 

case for early release if he stayed clean and 

worked hard.

When reporters later asked Judge Vance why 

he went so far beyond his duties, he simply 

said: "Sometimes justice isn't just about the 

sentence. It's about remembering that 

everyone in that courtroom is somebody's 

child. And that young man lost his biggest 

believer the day he needed her most. 

Somebody had to step in."

Three months later, Tyrell is a model inmate, 

earning his GED and mentoring younger 

inmates. And every month, like clockwork, 

Judge Vance makes the drive to visit — still 

keeping his promise.

Shivaraj Singh chouhan was CM of Madhya Pradesh 

for 16 years. He elevated MP from a bhimaru state 

to performing state.

Yogi Adhityanath is current CM of Uttar Pradesh 

and has ruled out for only 7 years. 

He has already turned around the fortunes of 

Uttar Pradesh.

Mamata Bhenerji is CM of West Bengal for 

13 years. How many more years do 

Mamata Bhenerji need to develop WB?

Are Canadians worried now that Trump has 

made it clear he’s willing to invade a 

sovereign country without even basic cause?

This story made me cry, not because it was sad 

but because it was strong. 

What is the biggest blow to Putin in 2026, so 

far?

The fall of Venezuela is really bad for the Russians. 

The nations that are friendly with Russia saw that 

the Russian military equipment Maduro had did nothing.

They saw that the Russians are doing nothing to 

help Maduro. They still remember Assad not 

getting Russian military support.

What would happen if Trump ordered the US 

army to invade Greenland?

Great question!

Here is the TLDR: A total of 3 major things would 

happen

1. The US military would take Greenland without 
2. a fight. The only military assets in Greenland 
3. are US assets at US bases, and Denmark 
4. doesn’t have much of a military.
1. EDIT: Yes, Europe has deployed forces. In 
2. total, a grand total of 40….. men. No units, 
3. not platoons. Just 40 guys.
5. NATO would likely dissolve within a few days, 
6. as such an attack would be considered a 
7. breach of the alliance's founding principles, 
8. involving a conflict between two founding 
9. NATO members. It wouldn’t trigger Article 5 
10. just because nobody wants a major war, but 
11. it would trigger Article 1.   Article 1 states: The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations
1. Article 1 states: The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations
12. The US Military would be gutted, and China 
13. would become the dominant power. The US 
14. has lots of stuff in NATO nations. Stuff we 
15. won’t get back.

Greenland is a territory of Denmark, which is a 

NATO ally; we all know this. If the leader of 

NATO attacks a much smaller NATO member 

(or any NATO member), 

then the alliance dissolves.

This would be a disaster for the US.

Here is the thing- do you ever wonder how the 

US can have ships operating near Yemen and in 

the Mediterranean, and Asia, and the 

Caribbean, and deploy troops ANYWHERE 

within a day? The answer: NATO.

NATO members host US bases with US troops. It 

also hosts US bases with equipment and no 

troops. Say a war with Russia broke out. Well, it 

is difficult to transport 1,000 tanks to Europe in 

a few days. So the US, over the years, has 

stationed an entire Armored Division in Europe 

without the men. So if war broke out, we would 

just fly in the men, and they would hop in the 

tanks. There are lots of examples of this.

• ¹A huge “medical center” for US forces, thanks 
• to NATO, is in Germany, where many injured 
• US soldiers are sent to recover.
• ²There are air bases and missile defense 
• systems in Turkey
• ³There are Naval ports in Italy, Turkey, and 
• Spain that allow the US to house and 
• supply ships in the region 
• ⁴There are hardened bases in Spain and the 
• UK that can load up missiles in vertical 
• launch systems on ships
• ⁵Food, medicine, weapons, ammunition, 
• Bradleys, Abrams, Artillery Guns, and more 
• are stationed in ports ALL OVER THE GLOBE, 
• which allows the US to fly in a Battalion and 
• field a heavy combat unit within a day or less.

Now, would any sane nation allow the US to house 

F-35s and troops in their nation when it is 

attacking other NATO allies? NO- NEVER.

Understand the magnitude of this. The US has 

8,000 to 10,000 aircraft, 6,000 tanks, and 

thousands of other weapons systems. THESE 

ARE NOT INSIDE THE USA. 

Some are, but the US is protected by Oceans and 

a massive Navy, so the US has deployed the 

VAST MAJORITY of its military hardware to 

NATO nations- at bases and depots. That way 

if we need to fight Russia, Syria, Iran, China, and 

whoever, we have gear nearby. So if NATO 

nations become hostile and afraid, 

they will “take” this hardware.

• Removing the “hardware” is not simple- these 
• are 70-ton tanks and much more. Whose 
• railroad is used? Whose airports are used? Will 
• these nations even allow that? Will they allow 
• a massive concentration of US Naval ships, 
• planes, and troops WITHIN their borders?
• 2. The newly isolated NATO nations will need 
• to rearm, likely fearing the US, will not give 
• up an entire regiment's worth of advanced 
• hardware because the bellicose US says so.
• 3. These nations must now see to their own 
• defense, which means “collecting” the vast 
• US stockpiles and putting them to work.

Most nations will HAPPILY accept 45 billion dollars 

worth of 6th-gen aircraft, Abrams Tanks, and 

state-of-the-art military hardware and give the 

US the finger. 

The US can be as mad as it wants, but it just lost 

2/3rds of its hardware- it cannot do much but 

further threaten and alienate allies.

---

Here is what is even more mind-numbing.

The reason Greenland is important comes down 

to 3 factors

1. Access to trading routes in the North as 
2. icecaps melt.
3. Putting more bases on the Island to 
4. control the North
5. Mineral and oil extraction

The big thing is control over the North and those 

trade routes.

The US currently has control through the UK and 

Iceland, THANKS TO NATO. They would leave NATO 

over this, meaning the defensive position in the 

North would weaken significantly. Seriously, look 

at this “region” with NATO nations in blue. 

Tell me who has “control.” This is like divorcing 

your billionaire husband to become a billionaire 

despite iron-clad documents stating you get 

only $100,000.

 It is nonsense.

Also factor in that the US has military bases in 

Greenland already, THANKS TO 

NATO.

DO YOU SEE WHY SMART PEOPLE VALUE 

NATO?????

Right now, Trump is making a direct military 

threat against a NATO member. This has other 

NATO members racing to build their own armed 

forces to perhaps face the US. Also, we all know 

a war with China is likely. Winning that war 

comes down to the floating aircraft carrier called 

Japan and the strong regional military of South 

Korea. Without them, the US has a limited footing, 

and these nations may even side with China 

(though they will more likely remain neutral).

---

EDIT/ADDITION

1. Europe did deploy forces, but they sent 40 
2. men, total. France sent 15, Germany sent 13, 
3. and then a few other nations sent a unit. 
4. These 40 men won’t hold back the US and 
5. the UK and France (nuclear powers) don’t 
6. want war with another nuclear power, which 
7. is the most significant economic partner by 
8. a mile.
1. Understand the response won’t be “war                                                 right now over Denmark's territory, it                                                    stole from native peoples”- instead, it                                                      will be days of meetings, mobilization,                                                threats, and then the breakdown of NATO.
2. These men are a “deterrent” force. This is 
3. what the USA should have done in early 
4. 2022. If a US Ranger Regiment were 
5. “training” in Ukraine, Putin could not 
6. invade and risk harming US forces. France, 
7. Germany, the UK, Sweden, and so on are 
8. hoping the same.
9. Reports vary, but it is widely “rumored” that 
10. Trump's most loyal Generals ENTIRELY 
11. oppose this because they know what it 
12. means. Additionally, it looks like it is opposed 
13. by everyone except Hegseth.

Last thing. US doctrine for the Cold War (and still) 

is to pre-deploy forces because the USA is a long 

way from Europe. Imagine moving all those tanks, 

helicopters, APCs, ammunition, and endless other 

items to ports. It took the US 6 months to deploy 

a mere portion of its forces from the US to the 

Kuwait border before Desert Storm.

The gear is an issue, but we will build more. Also, 

our ex-allies in Eastern Europe will need the 

extensive hardware we leave behind. The issue 

is that we will lose

• All of our intel network which are based on 
• cooperation and span the globe. No more 
• British, French, German, Polish, Turkish, 
• Korean, or Japanese intel.
• We lose our bases, which means our “air 
• cover” goes from global to just the USA
• We lose all leverage and control over every-
• thing. The US dollar will no longer be the 
• reserve currency anywhere, and nations will 
• seek new trading partners as the US 
• plummets into a depression and then 
• extreme isolationism.
• NATO nations WANT US bases because 
• that means US protection, training, and 
• assistance in weapons production (or just 
• the sale of weapons). This gives the US 
• leverage to sell US products (produced 
• goods like phones or raw resources) in 
• these foreign markets. This will be over, 
• and the US GDP will nose-dive.
• Additionally, many NATO nations hold US 
• debt that they WILL call in.
• I would expect sanctions too against the US 
• over such actions, which again, will KILL the 
• US economy. This, in combination with 
• tariffs, will force trading partners to seek out 
• new markets and abandon the US.
• This is no coming back from this. Attacking an 
• ally is the ultimate betrayal- it is complete 
• proof that your nation cannot be trusted under 
• ANY circumstances. Historically, when nations 
• turn on their allies, their global standing is 
• eliminated, and every single nation seeks to 
• distance itself from EVERYTHING to do with 
• that nation.